The American Spectator carries an article that I believe speaks well about the seemingly inconsistency of some SB leaders. This is from an observer that doesn’t have a dog in the fight. I have high respect for many signers of the SBECI, but I just do not understand their reasoning. My biggest concern is that we now have a group of people who have advocated expository preaching declaring that preachers begin an ecological topical sermon series, but we do not have scientific evidence that we have Global Warming.
It appears that something is strangely amiss. The ERLC is the “official” arm of the SBC that addresses social and moral concerns and their implications on public policy issues. But they have not, and apparently cannot, sign off on this document.