In my previous two posts I dealt with the false perception that discrimination was a valid reason to change the name. I also presented an argument that church planters do not go door to door expressing inviting people to come to their ‘Southern Baptist Church’. This final post will be a two-part post to deal with separating from our past. It seems that is another reason that we are hearing from those advocating a name change–our past is objectionable to some in leadership today.
While some are not as bold as to say we need to separate from our past they will speak about the “rich heritage” we have in the SBC. Whenever they speak about this “rich heritage” they will use only the names of those they admire. For example one writer expressed his admiration of our “rich heritage” but never once mentioned the names of Dr. Hershel Hobbs, Dr. Cecil Sherman, Dr. Olin T. Binkley, or Dr. L.R. Scarborough. Granted the writer was only mentioning names and I will give that benefit of the doubt. However, we cannot separate ourselves from the facts of our theological differences and how we work through those differences are the jewels of our “rich heritage”.
Who are the “Baptists”? Read more

